Issues and your chance to have your say

Media Releases

Correspondence Register

Join Us

About Us

Contact Us


ALL correspondence is treated as confidential and the author will not be disclosed to any person.

Join us on Facebook

Eurobodalla Ratepayers


All FB members remain hidden as best as is possible

Note : although the ERA list of friends will not appear on the ERA Timeline, there are still other ways in which people may see you.

You will be seen ONLY by mutual friends so be careful who you trust as a friend. Mutual friends with the friend viewer cannot be hidden.

This is because Facebook has declared that all users' lists of friends are public information.

If you have any concerns then DO NOT add ERA as a Facebook friend

The ERA exists to promote YOUR interests in the Local Government of our Shire

17th March 2015,

The ERA remains your organisation committed to applying the principles taken to the last election.

The resignation from ERA of Neil Burnside and Peter Schwarz is of itself no big deal. The fact of the matter is they have not had the maturity to see beyond personality differences with their fellow ERA Councillors so as to continue to work according to the ERA principles for the rights of ratepayers. A clear example of their breach of faith with those who voted for ERA was their motion at Council to pursue a Special Rate Variation which was 8% at the time. This was not and is not ERA policy. Currently ERA has sent a submission to IPART recommending a 1.2% rate increase to be matched by a 1.2% efficiency savings by ESC.

In some delusional way Burnside and Schwarz have justified their resignations by the absence of Mr Bradstreet who supposedly “was supportive of our position on a number of council policy matters”. Mr. Bradstreet can speak for himself, but it is a matter of record that he strenuously opposed Burnside and Schwartz on their SRV proposal. He spent countless hours trying to persuade the two to support the ERA submission without success.

An elected councillor’s job is to be highly critical of the operation of Council by the bureaucracy. They are the eyes, ears and mouthpiece of the ratepayer; being critical does not mean condemnation, it means analytical improvement and scrutiny of process. It has long been a battle with these two individuals to have them understand the separation of responsibilities. At committee they became apologists for ESC rather than the elected representatives of ratepayers.

Councillors are in the public domain as their actions can affect people’s lives at the core. It should be noted that these two councillors resigned from ERA by stealth. Their press release was and is the only notification the Committee received of their resignation. After the effort members of the ERA Committee put into resolving the interpersonal problems of councillors, I personally find their mode of action to be as disappointing as it is revealing.

The ERA remains your organisation committed to applying the principles taken to the last election. It also remains a non-profit voluntary organisation. We will have our moments.

Yours sincerely,
Ron Gifford
Registered Officer ERA.

PRESS RELEASE February 3rd, 2015


The Eurobodalla Ratepayers Association (ERA) opposes Eurobodalla Shire Council’s (ESC) proposal to apply to the independent regulator, IPART, for a special rate variation of 25.97% over the next three years.

This increase, if approved, will raise $5.7m from ratepayers and be supplemented by $15.7m of increased borrowings to allow delivery of a $21.4m program of infrastructure renewals and maintenance. ERA calls on all councillors to listen to the community and reduce the increase sought to a much lower, more affordable amount directed towards a better targeted infrastructure program.

Convenor, Geoff Plews, commented: “The ERA supports better council governance and management and a balanced operational budget. It acknowledges that, prima facie, the shire faces a backlog in transport infrastructure maintenance and renewal. Additionally, council holds many requests for community projects of varying merit which demand a response. These problems will not go away and responsible financial management requires that they are addressed, but in a way the community wants and can afford. ”

“Comprehensive community consultation has revealed that a significant majority of ratepayers reject the Special Rate Variation package proposed. Major evidence for this is that the Micromex survey research undertaken late last year found that about two thirds of respondents preferred no increase in rates to the detailed program recommended by council. It is concerning that in the face of this and other feedback, including a petition containing more than 6000 signatures, no changes to the recommended list of infrastructure projects has been made. Ratepayer opposition of this magnitude cannot be brushed aside.”

“ERA also believes that other sources of council revenue and cost savings have yet to be exhausted. Council holds considerable cash reserves, surplus operational land and commercial assets. The long delayed service review has considerable potential for further savings. Anecdotal examples of waste continue to be reported to ERA. All these matters have been ignored in the financial estimates”.

“Further, ERA notes with concern that council have done very little work on the ratepayers’ capacity to pay the large increases in rates proposed. In a low income community, this reduces the prospect of IPART’s approval of the proposal.”

“ERA understands the need for council to have a reliable and permanent source of increased income to address the infrastructure renewal/maintenance gap in the long run. But it questions the strategy of establishing this on the back of a large program of small, discretionary projects of varying merit which the community cannot afford. ”

Mr Plews said “Given council’s circumstances, particularly the need to respond to the community’s clear message, ERA recommends that council confines its special rate rise to an annual amount sufficient to cover the interest and capital repayments on increased loans of $10m. To achieve this reduction it proposes that council removes from the program those discretionary projects identified in the Micromex research as having lowest community support. These would include, the Moruya library extensions, improvements to local halls, provision of accessible viewing platforms and the upgrades to sportsgrounds, local reserves and parks. Taken together these reductions could cut up to $10m from the program."

"Essential, loan funded infrastructure projects with a demonstrated economic development purpose (eg roads, bridges, culverts, town centre revitalisations, Casey’s Beach rock wall) should stay in the program. If annual interest payments and capital repayments for only these projects were recovered through an SRV the burden on ratepayers could be reduced to an ongoing level of about $1m a year."

Mr Plews said “Council’s role is to supply and maintain the public infrastructure that the community says it needs and can afford. Council now has this information and must act on it. The reduced program recommended will address the most important components of the infrastructure gap for the time being. However, it will not assist an earlier achievement of a balanced operating budget and some community backlash from cancellation of small community projects can be expected. ERA believes the appropriate time to pursue the balanced budget objective through rate rises is after council has demonstrated to ratepayers’ satisfaction that all potential sources of internal savings and external funding have dried up. “

Mr Plews concluded: “While council’s current proposal is unacceptable to the community, a better targeted and greatly reduced SRV application has some prospect of community support and IPART approval.”

The South Coast Regional Sea Level Rise Planning and Policy Response

The South Coast Regional Sea Level Rise Planning and Policy Response Framework is currently on exhibition. The report presents the guidelines on how Council is going to incorporate sea level rise projections into the development and planning controls of your properties. It is suggested that all ratepayers visit Council's website and carefully read what the draft policy has in mind for defining what land will be subjected to sea level rise and what restrictions will be imposed to that land.

25th August, 2014.

By now a large number of ERA supporters will have received a letter from the Council on the Subject of Rising Sea Levels, and the possible impacts on your property. Thanks must go to Clr Milton Leslight, helped by David Lambert who has worked tirelessly, with the other ERA Councillors to bring this matter to the attention of a wider audience.

Remember, that since the last Council in 2011 passed this legislation - lead by Clrs. Thomson, Pollock and Brown, there has been a constant effort from the Council to NOT inform the community as to the impacts and effects of this draconian policy. Clr Pollock is famous for telling his colleagues that he did not wish to spook the ‘herd’. Don’t give the community bad news was his edict.

Each time the matter has been debated in Chamber , the five of Councillors - Brown, Pollock, Thomson ,Brice and Harding, who slavishly follow what the council tell them --have opted to keep the matter closed [ usual story] until all the Consultants reports are finished etc ,etc.

Clr. Leslight and Mr Lambert have found debate for the other side of the story difficult- to say the least!

The hypocrisy of the Greens councillor is there for all see. She wants openness and transparency on Huntfest, which is one of her pet subjects, but not on rising sea levels.

One ERA member has calculated that notations on his home for rising sea levels {the famous section 149 certificate} have changed at least 4 times in the last four years.

By the way, you can get one of these certificates from council for your property, but you have to pay for it! But even then, by the time you have received it, the notation could have been changed on the Council record as has happened to people already.

Members of the community who attended the Twyford sessions will remember the late Frank Milner expressing his disgust when the Council started to pin up on the walls the answers THEY wanted. The ERA has the same view on this subject. Behind closed doors, once again the community is being screwed for the dictates and benefits of a few.

We now know that the Consultants were given a briefing by Council, with a document which had been written by the Council Planning Department, and we believe, in collusion with the Office of the Environment and Heritage and the State Planning Department.

To some of us – that says it all.

The first thing that we ask you to do is demand from the Council to see this briefing document. This will allow you to check on how much ideology has crept in from our climate change / green/socialist friends who are intent on wrecking everything. We also want to check the figures that have been used.

The Consultant’s final report is now on the Council web site for you to read, but just remember who and what was behind it.

The final document will become part of the Coastal Zone Management Plan
If they will not release the briefing document, just like the In Sync report, you will know that they are hiding something.

The second thing to do is to contact the Council and ask for the hard evidence on how the policy will impact on you. Not some future computer model, but hard factual evidence. Correct sea level rise figures to date please - for this area.

For your information David tells us that Fort Denison has shown an average 1.4mm rise per annum for the last 28 years.

Ask the Council if they are using this figure?

Then make up your OWN mind as to the future.

Those of us that have lived here for a long time, remember that wild weather in the past has caused flooding through storms and high seas. Just like fire, this is the Australian climate we are talking about. It’s rough sometimes.

Looking at actual rising sea levels to date, they have been pretty minimal, but that does not stop the doomsayers telling us that we are finished in the future! Nobody really can predict the future weather patterns they can only make a measured guess.
The Insurance industry will be dancing. More costs for the community to bear.

Next - remember the actions of the rural community and the LEP. They formed committees and eventually got Council to change the hated E3, which was just another piece of mindless legislation that people did not want. Driven by the same ideology that drives the policy on rising sea levels.

Remember the recent Bio –certification fiasco. Voluntary for all Councils, who nearly all declined, saying no thank you - but guess what - yes OUR Council went for it!!
The community should have been at one of the LEP Consultant’s reviews where over twenty hands went up round the table from property owners in support of the removal of the planning department members who have caused the shambles. As one sane mannered member of the community said at the end of the meeting --The Council will do nothing about the planning department, but I bet the Consultant will never get work here again for telling the truth!

See how the Council works. Supposed community consultation, but nothing really changes.

At the same time the ERA feels that the State Government should NOT have given Councils the remit to resolve this issue. The matter is too important for local Councils to resolve. Some blame should be put on them for this mess.
So the ERA Councillors will give their time to talk to you about the subject, call them --- as well as David Lambert. David can be contacted through the ERA or by calling him direct on 0411 189 227.

It is up to you. Get organised, get your submissions in, get the facts, or get submerged in supposed water.

But Remember ----Can this Council be trusted to give you the correct facts or a behind the scenes political one?

Tuesday July 8th - Council Chambers, Moruya.

The following statement was read by Councillor Peter Schwarz when asked to speak to the subject of the BROULEE BIODIVERSITY CERTIFICATION STRATEGY

This is a very unfortunate business and I feel for the landowners in Broulee. ERA wants this development to go ahead, but unhindered by this draconian strategy.

I do not believe the landowners or the community have been given a fair go.

For too long has this Council been too cosy with the to the extreme agenda of The Office of Environment and Heritage. This poor excuse for bureaucracy must be reformed and I call on the State Baird Government to do so with urgency.

OEH’s decision making has been the cause of much division in our Shire and beyond.

Anyone who has been following the shambles of our rural LEP, and the fury that it still present in the community, as witnessed last week at the rural workshops, one can look no further than these faceless men and women who have NO respect for private freehold land ownership.

Slapping EEC''s and other harsh and unnecessary environmental constraints on private land, as they see fit, their agenda, without just compensation, is an outrage!

This Bio banking, Bio Certification Strategy is a collaboration of our Planning staff and the OEH, and, as others have said, such as Councilor Pollock and Councilor Thomson, we, the community and the landowners, have been BLACKMAILED.

Well, ERA and I do not believe in doing deals with zealots who blackmail our community.

House prices and development costs are dear enough in this State and in this Shire, without having this RUBBISH on loaded on top. If this scheme goes bust, the ratepayer will be left holding the bag to the tune of millions.

Since when did Australians concede to being blackmailed?
We are not living in some totalitarian dictatorial state!

I believe this scheme, to be a convoluted and ill though and burdensome on our community forever. I fear for the future.

We have been lobbying our local Member Andrew Constance, the NSW Treasurer, to closely examine their individual land tax situation. He stated on radio last week that he would do such and I strongly advise the effected Broulee landholders to keep him to his word. The likes of the Gillans have kept their word.

The NSW government was elected on the premise of cutting red and green tape. We are calling for action and a real review.

Hollow words and ministerial fob offs have got stop and action and the repeal of legislation must occur.

I also implore my fellow Councilors’ to reconsider their decision pending a meeting next week with new Environment Minister Stokes, Planning Minister Goward and Treasurer Andrew Constances’ representatives Thursday week.

We will press most strongly the NSW State Government to immediately abolish this clandestine piece of socialist rubbish.

Come with us fellow Councillors to this meeting. A last stand as it will. Please do not push on, support this rescission motion and come with us to help negotiate a better solution for developers and the community.

Rejection of this policy strategy is easier to argue than excepting it, but then begging for it to be repealed later will be harder.

Acceptance of this scheme will make Eurobodalla an investment risk, which will lead to a continued economic and social decline into his region.

I/we understand that Broulee must develop and fully support it but surely we cannot give in and capitulate so easily. We must press our case one last time most strongly.

If the result of the State bio diversity review currently underway, to come before Cabinet immediately, bears no fruit, we will hesitantly back Broulee development in its current proposed form, but we, ERA will always oppose Bio banking/ bio certification strategy.

Lets not paint ourselves into a corner.

Lets fight for A Fair Go. I commend this rescission Motion and its amendment to the Chamber

Peter Schwarz


Wednesday, 2nd June 2014



In the past week, the ERA has come under fire from some sections of the development community for our stand against bio - certification.

ERA's decision was not taken lightly, due to the fact that it is central to our base principles of supporting sensible development that promotes economic and social benefits while, at the same time, defending property owner's rights. The price suggested for the achievement of the first aim, delivered to us last week, is simply too high to support the tenet of defending the latter; property owner's rights.

For too long, successive state and local governments have refused to take a stand and, even 'though admitting schemes such as 'bio-cert' are flawed and largely accepted as being economic blackmail, have refused to take any action. WELL, NOT ERA!

We have taken a stand against 'bio-cert' to highlight to the state government and our local community that we have faith that the review, which they have assured us is genuine. It will highlight huge flaws and potential economic disaster, not only for our shire but the entire state, if the present process is to continue unchecked. 'Bio-cert' will no doubt become a bigger issue than the disastrous LEP E3 debacle if it isn't halted, especially for rural NSW. Anyone owning land with native vegetation should have alarm bells ringing very loudly in their ears when it comes to seeking to do any potential development.
South Moruya --- you are next!

ERA urges new ministers Prue Goward and Rob Stokes to act swiftly and decisively. ERA believes that due to the unique circumstances surrounding the offset lands that are proposed in this particular case, the Minister may be able to use her executive powers to permit this development, which is well supported locally, to proceed without the burden of 'bio-cert'.
What of concerns surrounding offset lands?

The proposed offset lands are PUBLIC and are already protected by a conservation order. They are under no threat of development. Developers are being forced to contribute huge sums of money into a bio - banking scheme that is fraught with inherent economic shortcomings which will potentially lead to collapse. If the bio-banking scheme fails, as predicted, then will the good 'ol Eurobodalla ratepayer will be left to foot the bill?

Sound complicated? Well it is.

ERA has taken a principled stand. We do not intend to prolong the delay and fully support the proposed development at Broulee, but NOT with the burden of bio - certification.

We appreciate the support of our local member and Treasurer, Andrew Constance and agree with him that the current proposal is untenable. We have no doubt his government is striving with us to reduce green tape which is strangling this state. It would be great to do this within in a united manner but we fear that we are on our own within the halls of Eurobodalla Council.
We want 'bio - cert' scrapped.

enquiries; Neil Burnside 0418 156389 ; liz Innes 0418 193518


Monday, 26 May 2014

ERA councillors call for removal of E3 zoning from Standard Instrument Local Environment Plan

Eurobodalla Ratepayer Action party councillors on Eurobodalla Shire council call on the NSW Minister for Planning and Environment, Prue Goward, to remove the E3 zone from the NSW Government’s Standard Instrument Local Environment Plan (SILEP). This controversial zone, which was introduced by the Labor government in 2006, duplicates a range of other legislative requirements, providing no increased level of environmental protection on private land.

Spokesperson, Councillor Liz Innes, said: “The Minister is soon to consider a revision of the SILEP following a study of the use of environmental zones by northern NSW councils in the development of their rural local environment plans. This is a major opportunity for the Baird Government to show leadership and act on the overwhelming weight of the submissions they have received from the rural communities of NSW.”

“This comprehensive study, undertaken by consultants Parsons Brinckerhoff, demonstrates clearly the practical difficulties for councils in applying the four environmental (E1,E2, E3 and E4) zones which are inadequately specified in the SILP.”

“The study documents the same issues feared by many local farmers as the consequences of the application of the E3 zone to private agricultural land in Eurobodalla shire. It is apparent that past proposals in Eurobodalla made much greater use of E3 zoning than were made by those councils included in the study. We are delighted that the study’s findings vindicate the concerted action taken by the Eurobodalla farming community to stop the over regulation of the use of private land.”

Councillor Innes concluded, “Eurobodalla land owners have made their opposition to the use of E3 based on inaccurate mapping very clear to the council’s rural land strategy committee. E3 zoning is unnecessary and it simply reduces the value of their properties and rural businesses. Land owners need now to repeat their past objections to the government”.

“In these circumstances the new Minister must remove E3 from the SILEP.”

Media contact: Councillor Liz Innes


Wed, Mar 19, 2014


Dear Editor Bay Post,

You have taken me to task for withdrawing my three sea level rise motions to amend council’s interim sea level rise policy at last Tuesday’s council meeting and proposing the alternative of an informed discussion with the community at a public workshop. (Editorial, Bay Post, 14 March).

I did so, not to play political games, but because I was persuaded by my colleagues that the motions were premature. They believed that, if the interim policy is to be changed, greater community understanding of the sea level rise issue and council’s policy is required. Also, they were concerned that the ERA’s opponents would move to keep faults in the design of the policy and the economic and social implications of these faults away from community view.

A public workshop, with invited technical experts, is one way to engage the community.

The interim SLR policy, which is based on very high future sea level rise estimates imposed on councils by the last NSW labor government, is costing ratepayers much more than is necessary. These extra costs arise because the last council chose to impose restrictions on a wider area than was done by other coastal councils operating under the same directive. And no assessment of the impact of this wide application was done at that time.

Additionally, council’s inflexible administration of the policy by, for example, not allowing consultants reports to be used for similar adjacent land, adds to costs.

Furthermore, council’s practice of not notifying land owners of the changes to the hazard warning notifications required by law is insensitive and unjust.

Because we are years away from a final policy these faults in the interim policy need to be fixed now. Otherwise, uncertainty will continue to be reflected in higher development costs and affected property resale markets will remain in the doldrums.

In passing responsibility for SLR policy to councils, the NSW government has invited the use of local “evidence” based data and shorter time horizons for future projections. Andrew Constance, the member for Bega, last week urged council to take up this opportunity.

The longest and most reliable set of past land based sea level rise data available in NSW (measured at Fort Denison) was ignored by council staff last time around. We need to know why.

Let me assure you that there is “hope for the owners of properties identified at risk of sea level rise that the issue will be addressed with common sense. “ Consistent with the ERA objectives of better, more transparent governance and management at council, ERA councillors will actively pursue improvements to the interim SLR policy and their understanding and support in the community.

This task is made easier by the Bay Post’s interest in desirable change at council.

Yours sincerely


Councillor Milton Leslight

Eurobodalla Shire Council


The ERA committee wishes all ERA associate members and supporters a happy new year. Last year turned out to be a very busy year at Eurobodalla Shire Council and for the ERA. Much of the groundwork for much better performance by council was done. This year promises further positive change to the benefit of the community of Eurobodalla Shire.
This is the first newsletter for some time. The committee apologises for this. To keep in better touch we will attempt to increase newsletter frequency this year. Important changes in governance and management at ESC are discussed below, as are other matters currently concerning ratepayers.

What are the mayor’s priorities?
Shortly after his election in September 2012 Mayor Brown told the ERA that his priorities were recruiting a replacement for Paul Anderson, reviewing the council’s administrative policies and getting through to Xmas. When these housekeeping tasks were completed in the middle of last year he announced that it was now time for council to do “something strategic”.
Six months on, we have yet to see any elaboration of this suggestion. Consequently, ERA councillors had to fill this leadership vacuum by arranging a meeting with their colleagues to work out the council’s direction. The outcomes of this meeting are discussed below.
It is mayor’s first responsibility to lead the council in providing strategic direction to the council staff on the community’s priorities. While he has thrown himself into his public civic duties Councillor Brown appears little interested in this aspect of his job. If the mayor is to gain community respect for his leadership he needs to be much clearer, committed and energetic in defining and pursuing the interests of the community and promoting these in political forums outside the shire.

What have ERA councillors achieved?
In September last year, council replaced Councillor Peter Schwarz with Councillor Neil Burnside as deputy mayor.

Councillor Schwarz described his time as deputy mayor as follows:

“It has been a busy year for ERA councillors with major results already achieved for the community. By working as a team, we have succeeded in stopping the hemorrhaging of the community’s rates, recruited a new general manager and realigned the priorities of council to focus them on economic and infrastructure development.

I am particularly pleased that, following our insistence on closer scrutiny of all expenditures, council’s actual operational costs for FY2012/2013 were $3.5m less than were budgeted last year. Moreover, capital grants received this year were greater than the level expected. While council is still running an operational deficit over the next few years, it is now planned to be about half the size of that bequeathed to it by the previous council.

There has been equally pleasing progress on the management front. All councillors have now agreed to a single set of priorities for this term. These were proposed by ERA councillors in line with its platform of getting the shire moving through much better governance and management. They focus on increased infrastructure development in Batemans Bay, Moruya and Narooma and management improvements within council itself.”

Given the mayor’s detachment and the hostility of some councillors to the ERA’s place in council, the ERA committee is satisfied with the results achieved to date and thanks all councillors for their hard work. The introduction of zero based budgeting played a large part in the improved budgetary position. For the first time in many years, the community can be confident that some of their elected representatives are closely directing council priorities and expenditures.

Management changes at council
After Paul Anderson walked out of his newly negotiated five year contract in January 2012 he was temporarily replaced by Rob Noble, a locum general manager from Queensland. Mr Noble, who had extensive experience in local government but little knowledge of Eurobodalla, kept the seat warm and collected a large salary and expenses. During his time here he had to handle a sudden change of management at the Batemans Bay Beach Resort. He commented that in his long time in local government he had not seen anything like the problem he had to resolve. Unfortunately, he neither provided ratepayers with details of what was done at this publicly owned commercial enterprise nor any forecast of the impact of the problem on the Resort’s marginal financial prospects.

Following a competitive recruitment process, Dr Catherine Dale was appointed as new general manager and commenced work at Moruya in April. She lost no time in consulting extensively with council staff and community groups, including the ERA. While she arrived too late to have much influence on council’s budget and operational plans, she moved quickly to sort out her senior management team. By letting Kerrie Foster go and having the next line of managers (Kathy Arthur - Community, Arts and Recreation Services, Anthony O’Reilly – Finance and Catherine Reilly – Communications and Tourism) report directly to her she demolished the structure proposed by Anderson and endorsed by Blackadder Consultants (four, then three, directors). Importantly, she put the two remaining directors (Warren Sharpe – Infrastructure Services and Lindsay Usher – Planning and Infrastructure Services) on fixed term, performance based contracts. This latter move, long resisted by the previous general manager, brings ESC into line with most other state agencies and implements a long standing ERA proposal to increase senior management accountability.

ERA welcomes these senior staff changes, but notes that they were made ahead of any comprehensive review of the type and level of services council needs to deliver and the community can afford. Dr Dale is conducting a review of services, but at a very slow pace and with minimal community consultation so far. She needs to advise the community of the principles she is bringing to the review, particularly as they apply to the continuing provision of non core services.

Unlike the mayor, the general manager has spelled out the priority management areas she intends to pursue. These are financial sustainability, community relations and communications, organisation culture, land use planning, economic development and risk management. ERA welcomes her approach, which is aligned with ERA priorities. In particular the community is crying out for a more focused and professional approach to economic development.

A small group of councillors is negotiating a performance agreement with her. Let’s hope the outcome is a small number of practical objectives which have associated measurable indicators which are made public. No one wants a return to the unsatisfactory and secretive arrangements between the mayor and general manager which characterised the last two councils.

Independent Review of Local Government
The independent panel’s final report has been provided to the NSW Government. It can be accessed at this link:

Many of the management reforms advocated by the ERA have been proposed and let’s hope they are adopted. The panel recognized that the old local government model of general managers dominating disengaged and submissive elected representatives no longer meets community needs.

We are particularly pleased that the panel has recommended to the Government that :
“contracts of General Managers should not be renewed within 6 months of an election except by means of a full merit selection process………”.

You will recall that ERA publicly opposed the uncontested extension of Paul Anderson’s contract by Fergus Thomson so close to the September 2012 election. Ultimately Anderson’s early departure and the strong field of candidates attracted to the subsequent advertising of the position supported our stand on this matter. To avoid such sweet heart arrangements in future we urge the council to adopt immediately the panel’s proposal as policy.

After much public protest the panel has changed its earlier structural recommendation that regional county councils should be formed to take over some of the most important functions of councils. In Eurobodalla’s case the Nowra based county council suggested covered Shoalhaven, Eurobodalla and Bega Valley shires. This grouping of councils was out of line with the existing South East Regional Organisation of Councils (SEROC), which better reflects the economic and social ties in the region.

The new proposal is that regional joint organizations are formed, with similar core functions to those proposed for regional county councils. The recommended joint organization comprises Shoalhaven, Eurobodalla, Bega Valley, Bombala, Snowy River, Cooma-Monaro, Palerang and Queanbeyan. There is no regional centre nominated. This new grouping of councils is also out of line with SEROC and ESC will need to evaluate its merits carefully. Moreover, some of the proposed core functions of the regional organizations direct conflictly the philosophy of the planning legislation reforms currently before the NSW parliament. In particular the ability of local communities to participate in local planning (ie development of DCPs and LEPs) will be greatly diminished if this function is taken over by a large and remote regional organization.

Anticipating a forced amalgamation, Mayor Brown told ERA that he expected to be the last mayor of Eurobodalla. While the threat of amalgamation appears to have passed it is not apparent to the ERA that the mayor is ready for the political argy bargy that will inevitably accompany the formation of the legislated regional joint organizations. He needs to discuss urgently the shire’s interests in any new joint arrangements with the community so he can protect them in these important negotiations.

ERA councillors and social issues
ERA councillors are required occasionally vote on social issues when they are come up at council. Often these matters are raised by small community groups with strongly held views. Sometimes they are opposed by groups with equally strongly held views. Generally, they are on subjects which are strictly outside the responsibilities of local government. Recently same sex marriage, unhealthy soft drinks and recreational hunting in state forests have arisen. There has been some discussion in the community as to how ERA should handle these types of issues.

ERA’s priorities are the reform of governance and management at ESC. A key part of this is better responsiveness to community concerns, whatever they may be. To achieve this we ran a diverse group of people as candidates at the 2012 election to ensure that the composition of council was representative of the community. About 40% of the voting community elected four ERA councillors, all competent and experienced people from a diverse range of occupations and parts of the shire.

The ERA councillors and ERA committee members do not hold uniform views on social issues and we have not developed social policies. However, councillors have all demonstrated a willingness to listen to the concerns raised by community members and to vote on what they see as the merits of these concerns. Moreover, individual ERA councillors may take a leadership position on a particular social issue, as Councillor Schwarz did on the availability soft drinks at council functions, and seek to persuade his colleagues of the merits of his arguments. In all cases, the over-riding consideration should be that community members are free to get on with their lives without interference from council, provided that the activity proposed is legal and not costly to other community members.

The way ahead
In the year ahead ERA councillors will continue to focus on getting council’s financial position back into shape. The long term financial plan needs particular attention to ensure it contains realistic estimates of the costs of those major projects required for the shire’s future prosperity. Additionally they will focus on completing the rural aspects of ELEP 2012 completed, producing a Coastal Zone Management Plan to manage sea level rise cost effectively and getting business and government investment moving again in the shire. Also, they will seek improvements to grant application, contract management and building approval processes.

It is only when council gets on top of these problems will ERA councillors be satisfied they have demonstrated the improvements in trust and competence the community elected them for.

Stay in touch
For practical reasons the Eurobodalla Ratepayers Association and the Eurobodalla Ratepayers Action Party have been merged and all ERA activities are now under the direction a single committee.

ERA councillors can be contacted as follows:
Neil Burnside : Mobile 0418156389 Email clrneilburnside@eurocoast.nsw.gov
Peter Schwarz: Mobile 0418466471 Email clrpeterschwarz@eurocoast.nsw.gov.au
Liz Innes: Mobile 0418193518 Email clrlizinnes@eurocoast.nsw.gov.au
Milton Leslight: Mobile 0418491264 Email clrmiltonleslight@eurocoast.nsw.gov.au


Speak out if you're not satisfied with ...

- Council's culture of bureaucratic growth and spending

- Council's refusal to look inwards to increase its efficiency and to cut spending

- Council's history of bad decisions

- Council's lack of transparency and openness

Through ERA we can speak out with ONE VOICE!


to join click here and send us your contact details and you will be
added to our Newsletter e-mailing list


Work with us towards a better local government in our beautiful shire!